Science of Being

[Awakened Soul]

Hi,

I've received the newsletter about the 'Science of Being' book and I'm confused.

There seem to be several versions of this book out there: paperback originals, paperback reprints, archive versions/additions, ebooks, Science of Being in 7 lessons, Science of Being in 27 lessons, Science of Being Set.... and there are multiple sellers out there for different prices....

What I'm not sure of is which one I should obtain to get the most practical empowering information?

[Awakened Soul]

Ok, I've sent an email to the Science Of Being World Center and got this reply (fast response!):


"You have written the Science Of Being World Center; we are the originators of this material and can help you with your questions.

     First the Science Of Being 7 Lessons is also called the Science Of Being; the original book can be obtained, usually on ebay and one usually goes for any ware from $200 to $500 dollars.  The reprints that we sell or other people are selling are only reprints of that original book.  The Science Of Being 27 Lessons is the original lessons to the archival updated version called the Fundamental Principles of the Science Of Being 27 lessons that the elder teachers put into print in the 70's and the 27 lessons are a fuller teachings of the 7 lessons but one without the other is not recommended.  The ebooks are ebooks of the 7 lessons or the old version of the 27 lessons but no one can reprint the Fundamental Principles of The Science Of Being because we still hold a copyright to that.  The only reason why people are selling some of our books is because our elders forgot to renew the copyrights in the 60's."

So to summarize:

- Science Of Being 7 Lessons = Science Of Being; the original book
- Science Of Being 27 Lessons: the Fundamental Principles of the Science Of Being = fuller teachings of the 7 lessons

[melody]

Hello Awakened Soul,

To tell you the truth, Adrian’s last promo newsletter for the “Science of Being” book greatly confused me.

The newsletter states that Lucifer is a metaphor for "Mind". Yet Adrian always told us that the God’s creative principle is “Mind”. Does that mean that there are several levels of the mind, or is Adrian and the book trying to tell us that Lucifer is God’s Mind?

Also, according to the promo newsletter, it was Lucifer who created the Earth. Yet the Bible clearly states that it was God himself who created the Earth.

Yes, it is Lucifer who can give you all sorts of riches that you might desire, if you give your soul to him. This is clearly illustrated in the Bible when Christ was tempted during his 40 days fast. And a lot of literature and art throughout the ages was devoted to this same topic. So is this how the Law of Attraction works? You have to be the follower of the Lucifer?

The timing of this newsletter was very curious. It was sent out on Palm Sunday, and the next round of the promo for this book will most likely happen – as what Adrian always does – on next Sunday, which is an Easter Sunday. Is Adrian trying to tell us something with this? Is he trying to tell us that we have to follow Lucifer, rather than the teachings of the Christ?

This is a really striking quote from Adrian’s newsletter as he comments on the book:

“This is an extremely powerful and relevant story, designed to teach
a truth. Anyone reading this will know the truth of "Lucifer" once
and for all.”

Is Adrian also trying to tell us that he has become a “Luciferian”? Or has he always been a Luciferian and has just come out of the closet?

[juliainkc]

Hello Awakened Soul and Melody,

Some interesting info to cast into the air and allowing the chaff to blow and seed to fall. Not to convince you of anything. Not my place. Just food for thought.

Here's an interesting link: Again, take what speaks to you and leave the rest.

http://www.jeremycrow.com/informal02.html

In Light and Truth,

Julia

[Baki Hanma]

I have purchased the book when I first received the email. I am liking what I read thus far . Think maybe I should slow down though. I haven't finished the O.U.R book yet 

[Baki Hanma]

Just wanted to say that I have finished lesson 4 and am liken what I am learning. Who ever knew the universe can be explained in such a way that it ties both "spiritual" and "science" together to prove a fact  . It comes to reason the the "Truth", the "Full Truth" cant be discovered on spiritual or science alone. They must work together in Harmony to make sense out of what one of the aspects failed to shine light on.

[juliainkc]

Here You Are Baki Hanma,

Amazing isn't it?

Be Well and In Joy this day,

Julia

[Adrian]

Hello Awakened Soul,

The situation is somewhat confused, but at the final analysis it seems that both the 7 lesson and 27 lesson versions were only available for a very limited time to a very few people around 80 years ago. This is why it is so rare today and in fact was more or less forgotten until I was led to it.

That situation is and will continue to change very fast.

These are extremely powerful teachings that must be made available to as many people as possible, and that is what I will do.

It is true that the 7 lesson edition should be read before the 27 lesson version which was later published as a course of 27 lessons rather than as a book.

The Lightbearers likely created the Fundamental Principles of The Science Of Being when they realised they had no copyright over the other versions, i.e. so they could copyright it.

Kind regards,

Adrian.

Ok, I've sent an email to the Science Of Being World Center and got this reply (fast response!):


"You have written the Science Of Being World Center; we are the originators of this material and can help you with your questions.

     First the Science Of Being 7 Lessons is also called the Science Of Being; the original book can be obtained, usually on ebay and one usually goes for any ware from $200 to $500 dollars.  The reprints that we sell or other people are selling are only reprints of that original book.  The Science Of Being 27 Lessons is the original lessons to the archival updated version called the Fundamental Principles of the Science Of Being 27 lessons that the elder teachers put into print in the 70's and the 27 lessons are a fuller teachings of the 7 lessons but one without the other is not recommended.  The ebooks are ebooks of the 7 lessons or the old version of the 27 lessons but no one can reprint the Fundamental Principles of The Science Of Being because we still hold a copyright to that.  The only reason why people are selling some of our books is because our elders forgot to renew the copyrights in the 60's."

So to summarize:

- Science Of Being 7 Lessons = Science Of Being; the original book
- Science Of Being 27 Lessons: the Fundamental Principles of the Science Of Being = fuller teachings of the 7 lessons

[Adrian]

Hello Melody,

Hello Awakened Soul,

To tell you the truth, Adrian’s last promo newsletter for the “Science of Being” book greatly confused me.

The newsletter states that Lucifer is a metaphor for "Mind". Yet Adrian always told us that the God’s creative principle is “Mind”. Does that mean that there are several levels of the mind, or is Adrian and the book trying to tell us that Lucifer is God’s Mind?

This is where the religious concept of Lucifer is greatly confused. It is a metaphor for Mind, or more specifically Ego which "descended" from the most innermost spheres in the beginning. We are therefore all Lucifer as well as God. Or to put it another way we are the Lucifer aspect of God in the form of Ego.

Also, according to the promo newsletter, it was Lucifer who created the Earth. Yet the Bible clearly states that it was God himself who created the Earth.

God created the planet Earth, Lucifer created the Ego aspect of Earth represented by the human race as we know it today.

Yes, it is Lucifer who can give you all sorts of riches that you might desire, if you give your soul to him. This is clearly illustrated in the Bible when Christ was tempted on the Mount Olive during his 40 days fast. And a lot of literature and art throughout the ages was devoted to this same topic. So is this how the Law of Attraction works? You have to be the follower of the Lucifer?

No - the Biblical representation of Lucifer is a myth.  The natural state of God and the Universe and therefore us as human beings and aspects of God is Abundance.  Look around you - creation is infinitely abundant. Poverty or lack is an illness of the Mind, attracted by the Mind, largely due to a poor connection with God of Whom we are channels of Abundance and Expression.

The timing of this newsletter was very curious. It was sent out on Palm Sunday, and the next round of the promo for this book will most likely happen – as what Adrian always does – on next Sunday, which is an Easter Sunday. Is Adrian trying to tell us something with this? Is he trying to tell us that we have to follow Lucifer, rather than the teachings of the Christ?

We are Lucifer just as we are God. Ultimately everyone and everything is God.  I have never suggested that people follow the teachings of anyone. In my case I simply share my knowledge knowing that everyone intuitively knows the Truth for what it is because we all have access to it.  This is why religious people pursue their activities without conviction, hoping for that ticket to Heaven, while those who realise Spiritual Truths find them life transforming. Part of my objective is to awaken what is already inside of everyone, and bring it forth into consciousness.

This is a really striking quote from Adrian’s newsletter as he comments on the book:

“This is an extremely powerful and relevant story, designed to teach
a truth. Anyone reading this will know the truth of "Lucifer" once
and for all.”

Yes. The true metaphoric Lucifer as opposed to the religious dogma of "the devil" or "satan" or "hell" - none of which exist, but all of which were invented by the church for the purposes of control through fear - i.e. do as we say or burn for eternity in "hell" as the guest of Lucifer.

Is Adrian also trying to tell us that he has become a “Luciferian”? Or has he always been a Luciferian and has just come out of the closet?

You do make me laugh at times Melody

Kind regards,

Adrian.

[Baki Hanma]

I've learned something a bit knew about the "Law Of Attraction" in this book. It could honestly be the best book on the LOA . However, clear something up for me please, thats be buggin me for quite some time. Why is it that, under LOA, "like attracts like", but for magnets, opposites attract each other and like sides repel? Are these two different forces? Cause when I think of attraction I immediately think of magnets as reference, sort of an old habit.

I would appreciate it if you don't ignore this question, or I might not be able to sleep

[juliainkc]

Hello Adrian,

Posted by: Adrian

This is where the religious concept of Lucifer is greatly confused. It is a metaphor for Mind, or more specifically Ego which "descended" from the most innermost spheres in the beginning. We are therefore all Lucifer as well as God. Or to put it another way we are the Lucifer aspect of God in the form of Ego.

God created the planet Earth, Lucifer created the Ego aspect of Earth represented by the human race as we know it today.

the Biblical representation of Lucifer is a myth.  The natural state of God and the Universe and therefore us as human beings and aspects of God is Abundance.  Look around you - creation is infinitely abundant. Poverty or lack is an illness of the Mind, attracted by the Mind, largely
due to a poor connection with God of Whom we are channels of Abundance and Expression.

We are Lucifer just as we are God. Ultimately everyone and everything is God.  I have never suggested that people follow the teachings of anyone. In my case I simply share my knowledge knowing that everyone intuitively knows the Truth for what it is because we all have access to it.  This is why religious people pursue their activities without conviction, hoping for that ticket to Heaven, while those who realise Spiritual Truths find them life transforming. Part of my objective is to awaken what is already inside of everyone, and bring it forth into consciousness.

The true metaphoric Lucifer as opposed to the religious dogma of "the devil" or "satan" or "hell" - none of which exist, but all of which were invented by the church for the purposes of control through fear - i.e. do as we say or burn for eternity in "hell" as the guest of Lucifer.

Thank you for saying it so well. As always I appreciate you.

By the way thanks for the photo!!

Many Blessings, Be Well and In Joy this day,

Julia

[Adrian]

Hello Baki Hanma,

I've learned something a bit knew about the "Law Of Attraction" in this book. It could honestly be the best book on the LOA . However, clear something up for me please, thats be buggin me for quite some time. Why is it that, under LOA, "like attracts like", but for magnets, opposites attract each other and like sides repel? Are these two different forces? Cause when I think of attraction I immediately think of magnets as reference, sort of an old habit.

I would appreciate it if you don't ignore this question, or I might not be able to sleep

Yes they are two different forces although it is a good question.

The Law of Attraction should really be The Principle of Harmony - I just created that term but it is true.

If you would like a physical world example take two identical tuning forks and place them about a foot apart. Now strike one of them. You will notice that the other one will then start to resonate as well and at the same frequency.

The Law of Attraction is about Vibration. Whatever we resonate we vibrate in harmony with and therefore attract into our conscious awareness. This is why in order to consciously attract using The Law of Attraction we must vibrate in harmony with what we are attracting by Believing and Knowing we already have it and with Perfect Faith.

Kind regards,

Adrian.
 

[sativaguitar]

Hi there everybody. Please excuse my ignorance if I get this wrong. According to the book I have just finished " The Art Of Redemtion". Satan as our in our darkness/ego must be embraced and forgiven for us to move forward and to stop it having power over us. An example given was when Jesus was tempted by "satan".. It goes on to say that this was his oppurtunity to embrace and forgive the darkness which he failed to do( not embracing and forgiving) and thus lead to his eventual downfall. Also due to the fact that he still hadn't forgiven those others etc that were plotting against him and that if he had his protection things may have been different, then continues to say that once embraced and forgiven this can then in turn be used to protect us as like understands like. This is just the authors opinion but any views on this. Looking at what I have just written I hope it makes sense.

Gary

[Baki Hanma]

Good Morning Adrian;

Yes they are two different forces although it is a good question.

The Law of Attraction should really be The Principle of Harmony - I just created that term but it is true.

If you would like a physical world example take two identical tuning forks and place them about a foot apart. Now strike one of them. You will notice that the other one will then start to resonate as well and at the same frequency.

The Law of Attraction is about Vibration. Whatever we resonate we vibrate in harmony with and therefore attract into our conscious awareness. This is why in order to consciously attract using The Law of Attraction we must vibrate in harmony with what we are attracting by Believing and Knowing we already have it and with Perfect Faith.

Kind regards,

Adrian.
 

Thank you for responding. I have always wondered about the difference. Though as I was reading in the book; "Science Of Being" the author labled the force that governs us all is a magnetic force. Magnets are magnetic and being that this book is suppose to be on the LOA as well as covering other areas, I assumed that they where the same force. However if that was so then the LOA must attract opposites and repel "a like".

I see now that they are different. "The Law of Attraction should really be The Principle of Harmony" - makes perfect sense now

[juliainkc]

Hello Gary,

Again, take the information and add it to your understanding. We, aka Us, aka = to the totality of possibilities as I am or I are 'incomplete' without your Certainty, Truth, (your knowing without having to be 'convinced', (i.e. Q.: How do You know?")The more who are Certain of = to Know (my dictionary of terms aka ~ My end of the whispers of the 'Tower of Babel' story  ;  'Ones' level of knowing (frequency channel) where the dead body( decayed, past) is, the vultures will gather.............' as in, our (group collective equals +/= I AM in my picture, story, questions, challenges, defamations, the 'STAR' of my movie' as...........hmm! as in I see you as this part of the equation not apart from equals (level ground, or.........In Lak'ech, having this experience from all different 'angles, part of the Dia ~ mond' or positions.  Sounds like babble Julia


For Julia, this translates into, Wil it Be. Ask. Expect an Answer. Delivered Communication. Sent as Asked For. Muffled?!? Where does the Intent begin. Oh, I know, Julia is thinking out loud.

Meat or Veges? Always Growing by the Many Questions. Which one would I leave out? Zero. Why? I asked for the "Whole View" Upclose and Personal.

There's All Ways Another choice Julia. What's that? 'All Mighty Divne Presence?

Hmm.........Indeed...Keep myself open = Options are the Totality of Possibilities...


Still learning the language,

'Marvin Gaye is playing in the back of my mind.......


Endless Blessings and Be Well, Just me whispering or in other words.....dreaming out loud.......

Julia, tripping and falling and loving every minute of it... hmm... 'Hi Elton', 'Follow the YellowBrick Road' is rising...Ya can't plant me in your....

You Rock!! Literally