See the article is just as vague as this type of science, the problem I have with particle physics is the assumption that an atom exists in empty space, that is electrons orbit around a nucleus and the space between these two particles is vacuum, I don't think it is an accurate description of what matter really is. If you are actually interested in this subject I suggest you read some of the articles on this website, all points are fully backed up with science that anyone with a background in physics can understand.
http://www.blazelabs.com/f-p-intro.asp If we want to create clean energy on this planet we have to work with mother nature, not against her. I believe the technology of particle colliders operate on the same principle which our current motors run on, that is extreme inefficiency, more waste than actual energy is created. If we wish to clean our planet up we must abandon combustion as our main source for generating electricity and instead use implosive methods, the same method nature uses all the time to create life. Combustion occurs in nature on this planet as it is part of lifes cycle, but it only occurs during times when life become disorganized and dead. Do we really want to emulate the "so called" conditions which existed in the early stages of the universe, which according to our current science, no life could survive. I think the energy and money wasted on these projects without any actual particle use ever being developed from it shows why it such a waste. An engine which opperates on centripetal force is the only solution to current energy problems, these engines have been created in the past by Viktor Schauberger and I really suggest everyone read up on this man, here's a start:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/19283526/Implosion-The-Path-of-Natural-Energy-Victor-Schauberger