"Time" must exist within a physical world in order to, as Melody pointed out, realize the movement from one place to another. The progression of time is what makes it possible to be "human" in that we experience this particular world the way that we do. Likewise, in metaphysical speak, to "progress from one level of vibration to another" also requires the "time" and "space" to do so.
So, this line of thinking begs the question of how "anything" can "exist" without the "progression of time."
"Existence" or "Being" or even "Awareness" -- whether in a physical realm or not -- precludes "a certain point" -- does it not?
Then, in consideration of this "certain point" doesn't this then preclude that there are other "certain points" where such existence/being/awareness is NOT???
If so, then wouldn't it be necessary for "the progression of time" -- in some form or another -- to exist throughout our ultimate reality?
Perhaps in trying to understand "time" maybe we are asking the wrong questions

Instead of "limiting time" to "physical worlds" alone -- in order to account for the difference between the physical and non-physical, or to account for the existence of "time" itself -- perhaps we should be seeking to better understand "relativity" -- and all of its implications -- in order to better understand both "time" and "reality."


