Dear Melody,
To keep this in context, the survey simply asked people, at random, including Christians, whether they believed in the "nativity story".
70% of those interviews including many Christians do not.
We must keep in Mind, that before Yeshua, there were 16 previous identical birth sequences, right down to the "virgin birth" and "3 wise men" - although they were known with different titles. The first such birth was Osiris, and the one before Jesus was Mithras - the Roman God - always keeping in Mind that Christianity is a Roman invention.
Constantine borrowed the Birth, crucifixion, death and resurrection from Mithras - who borrowed it from the previous 15 "gods", then used as many of the various writings that suited his objectives for the middle, burning the ones that did not, and altering the ones that almost did until they did.
Of course we must also take in to account that Jesus spoke Aramaic - a defunct form of Hebrew and Assyrian. The "Gospels" were first written between 60 and 100 years later from stories passed from person to person. It was written in Greek, then transliterated in to Latin and finally Medieval English - the form it remain in today.
Aramaic is not a literal language, and cannot be directly translated in to a literal language such as Greek - at least not without losing much of the power and meanings.
There are versions of The Lords Prayer and Sermon on the Mount from which it came surviving in Aramaic before it was corrupted - as indeed a discussed in my newsletter.
It will not be long now before we finally get to the true source of Jesus, which will end the 2000 years of misrepresentation forever.
Jesus never referred to himself as "the" Son of God. He always stated, as a core teaching, that every human being is a Son or Daughter of God. But that did not suit Constantine because then Jesus and God could not be positioned as their focal point for their the true objective of the Roman Church - control and suppression through fear and guilt.
So the Roman church was, and is anti to everything to the embodiment of the Christ Light in Jesus ever taught and stood for.
Becoming the focal point of a negative, dark, fear inducing, controlling instrument of the dark forces was the very last thing Yeshua wanted.
So why choose to be a part of it?
The origin is beautifully simple. The "bright star in the East" was Sirius. The three stars in Orion's belt had always been known as "The Three Kings". The Three Kings rise in the East in December - so are "from the East". They form an intersection with Sirius which is why they are said to be "following yonder star". The Three Kings and Sirius point to the rising Sun, the "birth" of the Sun, the birth of the "Son".
So in other words the nativity is based on a cosmological alignment which has been known as used for thousands of years in pagan mythology.
Not to mention the fact that the disciples either would not have been born, or would have been children, miles from the "event" - so how could they have remembered it if the disciples wrote the Gospels - which they definitely did not?
I could say more but I am sure you see what I am saying.
Hello Adrian and all,
This is one of the culminating statements in Adrian's last newsletter:
"Beauty of the Perfection of God and therefore the Perfection of Each of Us as God".
I am not sure why it is OK for each of us to have "Perfection of Each of Us as God" and therefore express the Source and be the Source, but to deny this perfection of being God to the most perfect being that worked this Earth, deny Jesus that he is God.
Every Expression of God is equally Perfect - there can be no other truth if you accept God is Perfect.
The only factor that varies is the degree to which humans Express that Perfection.
As Expressions of God it is for us to Evolve ever Closer to God through the process of Perfection until we Ultimately Approach Source, God, in a corresponding state of Perfection. And that is the Ultimate Meaning of Life.
God Became Man So Man Can Become GodAs in my signature at the end of each post. But of course includes Women - except that "gender" is simply a convenience of the material World.
In Love an Light,
Adrian.