Did we go to the Moon?

[melody]

There are a number of videos with a prove that we never landed on the Moon, and that the whole event was actually staged as a huge theatre production - one of many large scale productions governements do in order to control our minds.

Did we go to the Moon? Watch the videos below and judge for yourself. A short speach by Neil Armstrong at the end of the first video  is most curious.

I would like to hear what you think.

Here are the videos

Apollo 11 - Moon Mission faked by NASA
http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=4808231977254497831

Conspiracy Theory - Did we landed on the moon by Fox TV
http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=-1138935117048624484

Did we really land Men on the Moon?
http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=-2265515730495966561

Apollo 11 - Moon Mission faked by NASA
http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=4808231977254497831

Apollo Moon Hoax? Sun or Spotlight?
http://youtube.com/watch?v=sgID31UpYfA&mode=related&search=

Apollo Moon Hoax? Dr. David Groves Analysis
http://youtube.com/watch?v=A6MvcIs4OcQ&mode=related&search=

Apollo Moon Hoax? Spotlights, Fall-off, Camera Angles
http://youtube.com/watch?v=EQj-Mh__fRc&mode=related&search=

We Never Went to the Moon
http://youtube.com/watch?v=Nn6WZf_eOvE
 

[Awakened Soul]

Hi Melody,

There's an in depth book written about this by Ingo Swann, a seriously skilled remote viewer so it seems. One reviewer called him the father of remote viewing.

The book has exceptional information about the moon business and is sold at steep prices only because of it's rareness. There are of course 'other' ways to get the book, if you know what I mean. There are currently 8 seeders at demonoid right now. If you don't know what demonoid is, then Google it.

I haven't finished the book yet, but it seems to be splitted in 2 halves. The first is in story form, wich is one of the best entertaining stories I've ever read, and the second half is a more serious debate/explanation about what's going on on the moon.

[melody]

Hello Awakened Soul,

Could you please summarize briefly the book's main point.

[Awakened Soul]

Hello Awakened Soul,

Could you please summarize briefly the book's main point.

I haven't finished it yet, but basicly it seems to be about the moon being not so 'dead' and uninteresting as we were told.

[melody]

Please let us know more about the book once you finisn it...   

[wavepsychic]

Hi Melody,

 I do not know if we went to the moon or not, I guess we did but I just want to state the facts here.

Experts have looked over the footage of the moon landings. They are fake. NASA told Nixon that we can probably ready to go to the moon however we can't type it for the public. Nixon was angry.

They decided to fake the moon landing and it was shot in England. The actors were paid and sent to remote areas of Asia. They were later on hunted down and killed.

The Footage has wires seen suspending the actors.

There are no STARS in the footage! On the moon the stars would be a lot brighter. Some lady who was there said she remembers how they poked holes in a black sheet of paper & they just couldn't get it to look right.

The dust in the video defies Einstine's Theory of Relativity when applied to the moons gravity.

The Earth (Gaia) is seen from the moon to be about the size of the moon from Earth. Shes 4 times larger then the moon! How can it look the same size as the moon appears?

The type of footage that was used back then to film the moon landing could not have been used on the moon because the suns radiation would have distorted the film, & yet nothing was used to protect the camcorder.

We don't know if we landed on the moon but we do know the footage is fake. At the time it fooled the Nation & gave the people of that time the power they wanted. Its useless now.

[Awakened Soul]

Hi Melody,

 I do not know if we went to the moon or not, I guess we did but I just want to state the facts here.

Experts have looked over the footage of the moon landings. They are fake. NASA told Nixon that we can probably ready to go to the moon however we can't type it for the public. Nixon was angry.

They decided to fake the moon landing and it was shot in England. The actors were paid and sent to remote areas of Asia. They were later on hunted down and killed.

The Footage has wires seen suspending the actors.

There are no STARS in the footage! On the moon the stars would be a lot brighter. Some lady who was there said she remembers how they poked holes in a black sheet of paper & they just couldn't get it to look right.

The dust in the video defies Einstine's Theory of Relativity when applied to the moons gravity.

The Earth (Gaia) is seen from the moon to be about the size of the moon from Earth. Shes 4 times larger then the moon! How can it look the same size as the moon appears?

The type of footage that was used back then to film the moon landing could not have been used on the moon because the suns radiation would have distorted the film, & yet nothing was used to protect the camcorder.

We don't know if we landed on the moon but we do know the footage is fake. At the time it fooled the Nation & gave the people of that time the power they wanted. Its useless now.

There's a movie about this, 'Secret Space', that says the moonlanding footage is PARTLY real and partly fake. It shows the custom moon surface you talk about and it explains that if they didn't show people a moonlanding, the citizens would stop financing NASA's efforts. It's also goes into details that NASA used rockettechnology from NAZI's and that NAZI scientists were actually brought into NASA into America, before Germany lost the war, to work on NASA's projects.

It also shows the moonlanding pictures having multiple light sources which can't be if it was real.

'Secret Space' :
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1485155465058882626&hl=en


The more independent people come forward to tell their story, the more I see these kind of documentaries, the more I realize that there's much more to these conspiracies then most people would think.

I also witness chemtrails daily when it's sunny out here... Can it be to cover up something were not allowed to see when it's a clear sky? Or perhaps the cloudy stuff is a something else in itself?

[wavepsychic]

Hi Awakened Soul,

 I don't watch Google movies. I'm just not used to them. I like You tube. I looked up that chemtrails stuff though. Thats scary stuff. The U.S. Government breaks all laws & lies. In Buddhism there is a saying. Those who lie, there is not evil deed they will not do. Or something like that...

[Awakened Soul]

Hi Awakened Soul,

 I don't watch Google movies. I'm just not used to them. I like You tube. I looked up that chemtrails stuff though. Thats scary stuff. The U.S. Government breaks all laws & lies. In Buddhism there is a saying. Those who lie, there is not evil deed they will not do. Or something like that...

Hello wavepsychic,

My urls are not meant to scare people, but I do want people to at least have another angle instead of blindly supporting their governments. You usually only get one side of the story on the news, or no side at all (nothing is mentioned about chemtrails for instance).

I also heard a radio-show about man who told that people who see UFO's can't go anywhere with their story because they are ignored and ridiculed.  The female radio host asked in a mockery manner if there were 'little mars-men' in those UFO's. In Dutch, that's the way people know aliens, in the form of some kind of comic book, fiction, little, green characters that supposedly come from planet Mars. That way people dismiss any UFO or Alien subject without thinking about it twice. So the guest on that show was ridiculed instantly and could hardly say what he wanted too.

And a famous Dutch female weather reporter did pretty much the same thing when asked about chemtrails. She pretty much laughed about it and said to go outside, because the sun is shining. In other words: "Don't be an idiot, you idiots".


What's difficult about Google Video btw? It's better then youtube, because you can watch a long movie in one movie file instead of in parts. Also, when you search for something at Google Video, you get results that include other streaming media websites, including youtube. Youtube search result shows only youtube pages, so you're limiting yourself when searching there. Just something to keep in mind.

[wavepsychic]

HI Awakened Soul,

I do want people to at least have another angle instead of blindly supporting their governments.

I love being American but I don't support my Government. There Freemason secret society illuminati psychos who only care about themselves. Most people believe in Aliens and UFO then not, but chemtrials is something most people never heard of. I'm sure it has something to do with the Government just like the HIV virus isn't remotely related to any Virus found in nature. It is also the simplest virus.

What's difficult about Google Video btw? It's better then youtube, because you can watch a long movie in one movie file instead of in parts. Also, when you search for something at Google Video, you get results that include other streaming media websites, including youtube. Youtube search result shows only youtube pages, so you're limiting yourself when searching there. Just something to keep in mind.

I'll keep that in mind, it might be better I'm just used to going to youtube.

[melody]

Hello Awakened Soul and Wavepsychic,

I looked chemtrails up on the internet. If it is true, then it is pretty invasive and offensive.

There are also authorised ways to spray the air to alter weather, especially in the mid-west, the tornado region - I had posted about it in the past in another topic in this forum.

On the other hand, maybe we should not consider every white trail left by a plane to be a chemtrail. Some very legitimate contrails persist in the sky because of air humidity and other meteorological conditions. Here is a pilot's account which also mentions how some contrails behave in the sky, and also how chemical spraying is ejected and is seen just right next to the plane, whereas contrails start forming at an interval behind the plane.

http://www.nmsr.org/pilotsvu.htm

[Loraine Connon]

Hi All

Just noticed here some posts refering to Ingo Swann's book 'Penetration'.  I was lucky to recieve a signed copy for Christmas and it is truely fascinating reading.  Although it is out of print, anyone can read it online at www.scribd.com.  Also Ingo's current book can be read as a work in progress at his site www.biomindsuperpowers.com.

With best intent
Loraine
   

[Larry]

Any time that we elevate anyone for any reason we are wrong. Astronauts are just people, just like you and me. Any leader is no longer a human or an expression of Source. Source is not a hierarchy.    So called Angels are a Higherarchy.    All of earth's governments are a hierarchy.  We humans, for the most part, seem to have a need to have a hero or a leader or someone more important than we are. WHY? Is a leader more important than Source? We elevate someone like say someone that plays football real good. We make him a hero, pay him way too much money and are OK with him living in a mansion separated away from us. So now this person is a living expression of being more important in our lives than Source.                 Astronauts are highly invested in the hierarchy elision. Of course they are ready and willing to lie in order to maintain it.  Any time we elevate anyone we sin against us, Source.  This is true any time any place for any reason.   Silvermudflaps

[Larry]

I would like to add that any time we lower anyone for any reason, we are wrong.  Silvermudflaps

[Mina-Laura]

Dear Loraine,

Hi All

Just noticed here some posts refering to Ingo Swann's book 'Penetratration'.  I was lucky to recieve a signed copy for Christmas and it is truely fascinating reading.  Although it is out of print, anyone can read it online at www.scribd.com.  Also Ingo's current book can be read as a work in progress at his site www.biomindsuperpowers.com.

With best intent
Loraine
   

Thank you very much for this reminder about www.scribd.com, I totally forgot about this valuable source of free reading.  I heard about Ingo Swann's work but never had time to go in depth - however I look forward to reading from it.


Dear Larry,

Any time that we elevate anyone for any reason we are wrong.

Any time we elevate anyone we sin against us, Source.  This is true any time any place for any reason.   Silvermudflaps

I agree that elevating anyone to Superior unattainable status is a fallacy. However respecting their work, admiring the strength of character employed in achieving things that few have, and trying to emulate what moves us and inspires us in the observed example is a steering factor in our evolution.

Some of the best crucial moment in my life were when looking at something apparent I was lost in awe and thought: gosh, that could be me!! I can do that, I want to do/be that" and so on.

Thus I cannot speak for anyone just for myself, whenever I elevate anyone (my fellow humans), in a sense I'm also elevating myself.